Tuesday, 10 March 2009

Incineration versus Landfill?

The protest against a £400m, state of the art incinerator planned for Merthyr Tydfil (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_east/7933320.stm) is only the latest of a series of such campaigns across the UK (e.g. Oxfordshire, Coventry and Kidderminster). The protesters generally assume these plants will be dirty, smelly, dangerous and polluting but this is not necessarily the case. The one planned for Merthyr seems to be intended to burn only material that cannot be recycled or composted. It is possible to design incinerators to be relatively efficient in terms of their released effluent. In some countries (notably the Netherlands), incinerated waste is used to generate electricity. At the moment, the kinds of waste an incinerator could burn, finishes up expensively in landfill. This can also be polluting (e.g. generating the 'greenhouse gas' methane and with material leeching into water bodies). Something has to be done about such waste and perhaps incineration is not always the worst option?

No comments:

It's a Dead Parrot!

Scientists (what do they know?) are generally agreed. Most think the Paris Accord of limiting global heating to 1.5 degrees Centigrade abov...