There is a plan to capture queen Short-haired bumblebees in New Zealand (where their ancestors were introduced to pollinate Red clover in the 1800's) and to reintroduce queens of the progeny of these insects to Dungeness in Kent (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/sep/07/short-haired-bumblebee-repopulated). This bee was declared extinct in the UK in 2000. This should be quite an interesting study but bumblebees of many kinds are not currently doing well here. One can't help wondering whether the introduced insects will continue to struggle, especially as this species is said to be a fussy feeder in terms of the flowers that it will visit.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
Bee Back?
There is a plan to capture queen Short-haired bumblebees in New Zealand (where their ancestors were introduced to pollinate Red clover in the 1800's) and to reintroduce queens of the progeny of these insects to Dungeness in Kent (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/sep/07/short-haired-bumblebee-repopulated). This bee was declared extinct in the UK in 2000. This should be quite an interesting study but bumblebees of many kinds are not currently doing well here. One can't help wondering whether the introduced insects will continue to struggle, especially as this species is said to be a fussy feeder in terms of the flowers that it will visit.
Monday, 7 September 2009
Sunday, 6 September 2009
Consistency
Saturday, 5 September 2009
Seeing the Changes 230
Friday, 4 September 2009
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
10:10 and Football
The supposedly "achievable and meaningful" 10:10 G2 issue and the Tate Modern event (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/sep/01/10-10-campaign-explainedinitiative ) were part of the launch of a climate campaign in which "individuals, businesses and organisations of all kinds" (including Tottenham Hotspur football club) attempt to reduce their carbon emissions by 10% in 2010. The hope is that individuals (some high profile) will make a difference and also encourage politicians (who tend to be interested in votes) to be more robust in their support of attempts to reduce carbon dioxide release (although it is not the only problematic gas). Such campaigns are fine but have to reach people well outside the reach of one UK newspaper to really achieve global results (recent evidence suggests that levels of already released 'greenhouse gases' will not come down quickly no matter what we do). There is also a difficulty of people attempting to appear 'greener than thou' without really changing much. How one does the calculation is also important. To take the Spurs example. I am sure they are making very meaningful changes in their 'day-to-day' activities but one has to ask 10% of what? The club could dramatically reduce carbon dioxide emissions associated with it by asking their supporters to watch games on TV (especially in the case of away matches), refusing to take part in European competitions (if they finished high enough in the league) and avoiding overseas promotional tours. I don't think that any of these are likely to occur. Even if they did, they would simply be condemning the club to obscurity and failure. Similar considerations will apply to other types of organisation. Having said that, I am not against making the effort to do something.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
I n the UK and US, a pparently popular and successful vegan/vegetarian restaurants are reportedly closing or adding meat to their menus ( ...
-
Early ripening fruit may seem convenient but some folk think it confirms environmental stress. There's also a possibility th...