Yet another case in the USA where people have tried to establish in a court of law that Chimpanzees have personhood (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/04/court-denies-legal-personhood-of-chimpanzees). This time the courts ruled that these primates (our closest surviving 'relative' in the Animal Kingdom) were not human because they would not be able to take on responsibilities along with the rights that granting them honorary human status would give them. I broadly support this view (although I do favour extra protections for this species) but it is a murky old area as the law does accept that humans do not lose their human status when massively intellectually impaired. The difficulty in this type of debate is where to draw the fuzzy line (all primates? all mammals? 'intelligent' species only- so chimps, dolphins and crows?). There are likely to be appeals, so this one will run and run.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Friday, 5 December 2014
Monkey Morality?
Yet another case in the USA where people have tried to establish in a court of law that Chimpanzees have personhood (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/04/court-denies-legal-personhood-of-chimpanzees). This time the courts ruled that these primates (our closest surviving 'relative' in the Animal Kingdom) were not human because they would not be able to take on responsibilities along with the rights that granting them honorary human status would give them. I broadly support this view (although I do favour extra protections for this species) but it is a murky old area as the law does accept that humans do not lose their human status when massively intellectually impaired. The difficulty in this type of debate is where to draw the fuzzy line (all primates? all mammals? 'intelligent' species only- so chimps, dolphins and crows?). There are likely to be appeals, so this one will run and run.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Food For Thought?
The link between global heating and food prices is clearly illustrated in a recent CarbonBrief ( https://www.carbonbrief.org/five-charts-ho...
-
Garden plants in France, The Netherlands, The UK and Sikkim (NE India).
-
Common toadflax ( Linaria vulgaris ) contains a moderately toxic glucoside.
-
The UK's Deputy Prime Minister has been advising Brits on how to 'better prepare for future pandemics, disasters and cyber attacks&...
No comments:
Post a Comment