Great news! The G7 have reportedly pledged to end their use of fossil fuels to generate electricity 'by the end of the century' (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/08/g7-fossil-fuel-pledge-is-a-diplomatic-coup-for-germanys-climate-chancellor). The only troubles with such pledges (although the idea is eminently sensible) are a) the end of the century is a long way off in carbon dioxide emission terms (some authorities think we have gone too far to limit devastating changes already); b) methane produced by cows is even more potent as a 'greenhouse gas' in the global warming stakes (or steaks?); c) future politicians have a habit of wriggling out of pledges made by their predecessors; d) big, developing countries often argue that, although they are keen to get round to limiting the emission of climate-change linked gases, it is more important (especially to their re-election chances) that their populations are 'lifted out of poverty' and this, unfortunately, requires increased coal, oil and gas use; e) the multinational, hydrocarbon-prospecting companies are unlikely to go quietly and f) nuclear energy production would probably have to increase with its attendant risks.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Tuesday, 9 June 2015
Pigs Might...?
Great news! The G7 have reportedly pledged to end their use of fossil fuels to generate electricity 'by the end of the century' (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/08/g7-fossil-fuel-pledge-is-a-diplomatic-coup-for-germanys-climate-chancellor). The only troubles with such pledges (although the idea is eminently sensible) are a) the end of the century is a long way off in carbon dioxide emission terms (some authorities think we have gone too far to limit devastating changes already); b) methane produced by cows is even more potent as a 'greenhouse gas' in the global warming stakes (or steaks?); c) future politicians have a habit of wriggling out of pledges made by their predecessors; d) big, developing countries often argue that, although they are keen to get round to limiting the emission of climate-change linked gases, it is more important (especially to their re-election chances) that their populations are 'lifted out of poverty' and this, unfortunately, requires increased coal, oil and gas use; e) the multinational, hydrocarbon-prospecting companies are unlikely to go quietly and f) nuclear energy production would probably have to increase with its attendant risks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Mood Music?
In 2015, singer/song-writer Joni Mitchell had a massive stroke. When she left hospital, she could neither walk nor talk. Her prognosis was...
-
It's necessary, where possible, to replace diesel and petrol-fueled vehicles by electrical equivalents. Electric vehicles (EVs) don...
-
Zonal pricing is a proposed change to the UK energy market. It would result in energy consumers paying less for electricity, if they are ba...
-
Seagrasses are the only flowering plants growing in marine environments. Seagrass meadows (large accumulations of these plants) provide vit...
No comments:
Post a Comment