Great news! The G7 have reportedly pledged to end their use of fossil fuels to generate electricity 'by the end of the century' (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/08/g7-fossil-fuel-pledge-is-a-diplomatic-coup-for-germanys-climate-chancellor). The only troubles with such pledges (although the idea is eminently sensible) are a) the end of the century is a long way off in carbon dioxide emission terms (some authorities think we have gone too far to limit devastating changes already); b) methane produced by cows is even more potent as a 'greenhouse gas' in the global warming stakes (or steaks?); c) future politicians have a habit of wriggling out of pledges made by their predecessors; d) big, developing countries often argue that, although they are keen to get round to limiting the emission of climate-change linked gases, it is more important (especially to their re-election chances) that their populations are 'lifted out of poverty' and this, unfortunately, requires increased coal, oil and gas use; e) the multinational, hydrocarbon-prospecting companies are unlikely to go quietly and f) nuclear energy production would probably have to increase with its attendant risks.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Tuesday, 9 June 2015
Pigs Might...?
Great news! The G7 have reportedly pledged to end their use of fossil fuels to generate electricity 'by the end of the century' (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/08/g7-fossil-fuel-pledge-is-a-diplomatic-coup-for-germanys-climate-chancellor). The only troubles with such pledges (although the idea is eminently sensible) are a) the end of the century is a long way off in carbon dioxide emission terms (some authorities think we have gone too far to limit devastating changes already); b) methane produced by cows is even more potent as a 'greenhouse gas' in the global warming stakes (or steaks?); c) future politicians have a habit of wriggling out of pledges made by their predecessors; d) big, developing countries often argue that, although they are keen to get round to limiting the emission of climate-change linked gases, it is more important (especially to their re-election chances) that their populations are 'lifted out of poverty' and this, unfortunately, requires increased coal, oil and gas use; e) the multinational, hydrocarbon-prospecting companies are unlikely to go quietly and f) nuclear energy production would probably have to increase with its attendant risks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Too Greedy To Change Course?
George Monbiot suggests an 'all-seeing eye' (a god?), looking at the Earth, might be intrigued to spot 'A species that knows it...
-
Garden plants in France, The Netherlands, The UK and Sikkim (NE India).
-
Common toadflax ( Linaria vulgaris ) contains a moderately toxic glucoside.
-
The UK's Deputy Prime Minister has been advising Brits on how to 'better prepare for future pandemics, disasters and cyber attacks&...
No comments:
Post a Comment