I think that it's a change of focus, rather than a change in the facts, but the recent report by the Lancet/UCL commission on health and climate change is most welcome as it points out that world health can be driven back (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/23/climate-change-threatens-50-years-of-progress-in-global-health-study-says). It has been fairly obvious that climate change would be detrimental to people in marginally viable parts of the globe but recognition that it would impact on health issues even in the UK's NHS has been slower to emerge. With this and the pope's encyclical, perhaps we are getting away from purely financial arguments about the need to curtail emissions that make 'global warming' more problematic? The financial arguments still apply (and one can understand why they achieved prominence in their time) but they were always unlikely to influence behaviour of the masses, a necessary condition for achieving lasting improvements. One just hopes that a) messages get across, b) people act on them; c) the messages are not 'muddied' by vested interests and d) it is not too late to effect meaningful change.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Tuesday, 23 June 2015
Red Signs in the Sunset?
I think that it's a change of focus, rather than a change in the facts, but the recent report by the Lancet/UCL commission on health and climate change is most welcome as it points out that world health can be driven back (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/23/climate-change-threatens-50-years-of-progress-in-global-health-study-says). It has been fairly obvious that climate change would be detrimental to people in marginally viable parts of the globe but recognition that it would impact on health issues even in the UK's NHS has been slower to emerge. With this and the pope's encyclical, perhaps we are getting away from purely financial arguments about the need to curtail emissions that make 'global warming' more problematic? The financial arguments still apply (and one can understand why they achieved prominence in their time) but they were always unlikely to influence behaviour of the masses, a necessary condition for achieving lasting improvements. One just hopes that a) messages get across, b) people act on them; c) the messages are not 'muddied' by vested interests and d) it is not too late to effect meaningful change.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Too Greedy To Change Course?
George Monbiot suggests an 'all-seeing eye' (a god?), looking at the Earth, might be intrigued to spot 'A species that knows it...
-
Garden plants in France, The Netherlands, The UK and Sikkim (NE India).
-
Common toadflax ( Linaria vulgaris ) contains a moderately toxic glucoside.
-
The UK's Deputy Prime Minister has been advising Brits on how to 'better prepare for future pandemics, disasters and cyber attacks&...
No comments:
Post a Comment