The burning of millions of pounds worth of confiscated Elephant ivory by Kenya authorities makes a serious point (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/30/kenya-to-burn-largest-ever-ivory-stockpile-to-highlight-elephants-fate), namely that the elephants are worth much more alive to that country (and to the planet?) than the poacher's premium. There has been some debate about whether the destruction might drive up the price and increase poaching activity but I do think that treating ivory as a 'crop' (even if the resulting money is directed at conservation) would be a mistake. The trouble is that the amounts of money involved are very attractive to poachers, middle men and the ivory carvers with their clients. Breaking this inducement will be difficult.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
'Stone age' Food Production?
Michael Grunwald's book, Are We Eating the Earth? points out that around one third of 'greenhouse gases' are generated by proc...
-
It's necessary, where possible, to replace diesel and petrol-fueled vehicles by electrical equivalents. Electric vehicles (EVs) don...
-
It should hardly be called a study. A Which comparison looked at levels of nitrogen dioxide and small particulates (PM 2.5s) in 5 Londo...
No comments:
Post a Comment