+in+flight+close+up.jpg)
The 'hot' news (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7832301.stm) that an internal US flight from New York was forced down into the Hudson river (fortunately, without any loss of life) by a bird strike (probably geese) emphasises one of the particular difficulties of citing airports in wetland locations. The 'local' UK debate about alternatives to a 3rd Heathrow runway, including the possibility of creating an island in the Thames estuary would certainly have to take this possibility into consideration. It will be interesting (seeing how the protagonists are lined up) to see what happens in relation to the proposed Heathrow development (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/16/heathrow-runway-politics). It is difficult to see how increased flights can be accommodated with a simultaneous planned reduction in UK carbon dioxide generation and a limiting of noise. The concept of 'green' flights seems unrealistic, as even the much-touted 'biofuels', generate 'greenhouse gases' and carbon offsetting by planting trees) doesn't appear to work .
Friday, 16 January 2009
Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane?
The 'hot' news (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7832301.stm) that an internal US flight from New York was forced down into the Hudson river (fortunately, without any loss of life) by a bird strike (probably geese) emphasises one of the particular difficulties of citing airports in wetland locations. The 'local' UK debate about alternatives to a 3rd Heathrow runway, including the possibility of creating an island in the Thames estuary would certainly have to take this possibility into consideration. It will be interesting (seeing how the protagonists are lined up) to see what happens in relation to the proposed Heathrow development (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/16/heathrow-runway-politics). It is difficult to see how increased flights can be accommodated with a simultaneous planned reduction in UK carbon dioxide generation and a limiting of noise. The concept of 'green' flights seems unrealistic, as even the much-touted 'biofuels', generate 'greenhouse gases' and carbon offsetting by planting trees) doesn't appear to work .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
%20lateral%20Loughor.jpg)
-
It's necessary, where possible, to replace diesel and petrol-fueled vehicles by electrical equivalents. Electric vehicles (EVs) don... -
Europe has a city congestion problem. In 2023, London was the most gridlocked location, closely followed by Paris and Dublin. In that year... -
Seagrasses are the only flowering plants growing in marine environments. Seagrass meadows (large accumulations of these plants) provide vit...
2 comments:
The people who want this 3rd Heathrow runway say they need it to keep and attract business. The Government could try and persuade us to give up our holidays abroad (which are a luxury not a necessity) to make way for increased business traffic or increase the cost of flying to reflect its true cost.
They certainly could but perhaps also they should discourage short-haul flights (like a short trip in a car, very energy consuming). What we need is a decent, swift and relatively cheap rail system.
Post a Comment