It has been reported that UK children consume more 'energy drinks' than any of their counterparts in other countries (https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jul/09/flying-high-kids-in-the-uk-are-wild-about-energy-drinks-but-how-harmful-are-they) and there is a debate about whether this billion pound industry is harmful or not to this cohort. The 'energy drinks' do contain energy (usually in the form of glucose) but generally also deliver high doses of caffeine. There is consequently some concern that taking such materials on board might be linked to hyperactivity and failure to concentrate. I would (and have) argued, however, that the term 'energy drink' is misleading. In many cases, taking a slug of glucose causes a condition called reactive hypoglycaemia (the intake of the sugar releases insulin, causing blood sugar levels to fall below their normal levels). This results in the ingester actually having less energy to do things. It would be interesting to assess whether the taking in of such fluids by children has a major role in the development of type 2 diabetes.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Food For Thought?
The link between global heating and food prices is clearly illustrated in a recent CarbonBrief ( https://www.carbonbrief.org/five-charts-ho...
-
Garden plants in France, The Netherlands, The UK and Sikkim (NE India).
-
Common toadflax ( Linaria vulgaris ) contains a moderately toxic glucoside.
-
The UK's Deputy Prime Minister has been advising Brits on how to 'better prepare for future pandemics, disasters and cyber attacks&...
No comments:
Post a Comment