I try to avoid politics wherever possible (it's hardly based on Science and I don't really understand it) but there is an interesting study from the Dutch on the impact of EU environmental laws. They basically did a study where they attempted to contrast what would have happened to their country's environment with and without the EU regulations on environmental standards (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/30/pollutionwatch-where-would-we-be-without-eu-environmental-laws). In essence, without the agreed legislation, they believe that levels of particulates in the air of their cities would now be similar to those in China and India with a resulting reduction in life expectancy. There would also have been more damage from acid rain as well as dirtier water courses and beaches. Of course, without the EU, The Netherlands might well have strengthened its environmental protections over this period but a) it's easier to do when it's agreed conjointly and b) acid rain, 'greenhouse gases', particulates and pesticides are no respecters of borders.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Friday, 31 January 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Too Greedy To Change Course?
George Monbiot suggests an 'all-seeing eye' (a god?), looking at the Earth, might be intrigued to spot 'A species that knows it...
-
Garden plants in France, The Netherlands, The UK and Sikkim (NE India).
-
Common toadflax ( Linaria vulgaris ) contains a moderately toxic glucoside.
-
The UK's Deputy Prime Minister has been advising Brits on how to 'better prepare for future pandemics, disasters and cyber attacks&...
No comments:
Post a Comment