Golden Oldies?

As social animals get older, they often gain a richer understanding of their environments. They often use this information for the benefit of their group. The information is, in deed, often passed on to younger group members. Unfortunately, however, older animals tend to be 'harvested' by hunters. They have more meat and/or possess the largests horns, antlers or tusks. Oldster elimination can have significant negative impacts on group culture and social structures. It also removes knowledge of favourable and dangerous locations. Some researchers now advocate longevity conservation where more mature animals are left in place (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/dec/06/saving-old-and-wise-animals-vital-for-species-survival-say-scientists-longevity-conservation). Longevity conservation could have benefits, so long as it's done properly. Age alone shouldn't be the sole criterion. Otherwise decrepit animals might be conserved rather than counterparts who could really benefit the group. Perhaps, there's still utility for ancient humans like myself?