There is an interesting account in the National geographic about the often illegal trade in dead butterflies (https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/08/butterfly-catchers-collectors-indonesia-market-blumei/). What stands out for me is the fact that conservation areas in some countries appear to be routinely raided for specimens with little official complaint (even tolerating local markets where protected species are traded); how little the 'rustlers' get for their specimens and how much some industrialists, in places like Japan (reportedly enthusiastic for butterflies), will pay for them. Personally, I cannot see why a dead specimen has greater cachet than a nice digital image.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Worm-Friendly Wines?
Earthworms are important for the health of soils. They aerate the soil and recycle organic material. These organisms have, however, greatly...
-
Early ripening fruit may seem convenient but some folk think it confirms environmental stress. There's also a possibility th...
-
It's necessary, where possible, to replace diesel and petrol-fueled vehicles by electrical equivalents. Electric vehicles (EVs) don...
No comments:
Post a Comment