There is an interesting account in the National geographic about the often illegal trade in dead butterflies (https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/08/butterfly-catchers-collectors-indonesia-market-blumei/). What stands out for me is the fact that conservation areas in some countries appear to be routinely raided for specimens with little official complaint (even tolerating local markets where protected species are traded); how little the 'rustlers' get for their specimens and how much some industrialists, in places like Japan (reportedly enthusiastic for butterflies), will pay for them. Personally, I cannot see why a dead specimen has greater cachet than a nice digital image.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
It should hardly be called a study. A Which comparison looked at levels of nitrogen dioxide and small particulates (PM 2.5s) in 5 Londo...
-
Europe has a city congestion problem. In 2023, London was the most gridlocked location, closely followed by Paris and Dublin. In that year...
-
It's necessary, where possible, to replace diesel and petrol-fueled vehicles by electrical equivalents. Electric vehicles (EVs) don...
No comments:
Post a Comment