It seems that men are almost twice as likely to die from a Covid-19 infection than are women. The reasons for this are, however, currently obscure (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/men-are-much-more-likely-to-die-from-coronavirus-but-why). One of the first suggestions, from the Chinese outbreak, was that it was related to the levels of cigarette smoking (much higher in males than females in that country). But the male death bias persists in other countries where the levels of smoking in men and women are not so different. Another suggestion relates to behavioural differences between the genders, with males being less likely to wash their hands or to seek timely medical help than their female counterparts. More recently, attempts have been made to implicate biological factors such as the impact of sex hormones on the immune system or even an effect of the 'X' chromosome (with men obviously only having one, whereas females have 2). Whatever way you cut it, the dice appear to be stacked against males in this pandemic.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Monday, 20 April 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Too Greedy To Change Course?
George Monbiot suggests an 'all-seeing eye' (a god?), looking at the Earth, might be intrigued to spot 'A species that knows it...
-
Garden plants in France, The Netherlands, The UK and Sikkim (NE India).
-
Common toadflax ( Linaria vulgaris ) contains a moderately toxic glucoside.
-
The UK's Deputy Prime Minister has been advising Brits on how to 'better prepare for future pandemics, disasters and cyber attacks&...
No comments:
Post a Comment