Gently Flows the Innova Test

I seem to have been ranting on about this for ages. Anyone, with a functioning neurone, could have worked out that the Innova lateral flow test for Covid-19 is only suitable for quick and crude assessments (it's far from having the claimed 77% accuracy). Now, a number of experts, including Professor Jon Deeks of Birmingham University, have called on the UK government to halt (or at least pause) the mass testing programme for symptomless people in care homes, schools and the community (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/12/experts-call-for-rethink-lateral-flow-mass-testing-covid-uk). One can't say too many times IT ONLY PICKS UP 60% OF INFECTIONS. Many of the asymptomatic carriers of the virus will not be detected (claims to the contrary are a con). Being quick and not requiring a laboratory, will be little consolation, if their result gives people a false sense of security. Apparently 'cleared', aymptomatic people will generally change their behaviour and transmission rates could rocket. I really can't understand the apparent faith placed in this technology. They either don't understand the test or think that the activity around it makes good 'window-dressing'.