Sunday, 16 August 2020

Missing Links

 


One very detrimental educational loss associated with the Covid-19 pandemic is that it has made residential field courses impossible for Biologists and Geographers. I was always very much a laboratory-based scientist but, when I acquired responsibilities for field courses (largely by default), I came to appreciate what a powerful effect they had on students. Both subject areas try to encourage the development of practical skills and a love of the subject, as well as an ability to do group working (all the better, if you can get people from different subject areas to spin ideas off each other). Living and working together is also often an excellent way of encouraging friendships (some can last for a life-time) and respect for others. The field course is a major way (in, generally relaxed circumstances) that students can get extended access to academic staff (and appreciate that they are human too). Exotic field courses (I appreciate that there is a carbon footprint problem) not only encourage students to opt for certain degrees but broaden their horizons.  They come to appreciate problems that all humanity shares as well as specific concerns associated with particular locations. Experience tells me that the vast majority of students become better 'rounded' people, after doing a residential field course (although you naturally have to be careful for the welfare of some vulnerable participants). The sooner they can come back, the better!  

No comments:

Food For Thought?

The link between global heating and food prices is clearly illustrated in a recent CarbonBrief ( https://www.carbonbrief.org/five-charts-ho...