I suppose we shouldn't be surprised but recent research, using finer collection nets, suggests that the numbers of microplastic particles in the oceans has been grossly underestimated (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/may/22/microplastic-pollution-in-oceans-vastly-underestimated-study). The new findings suggest that the actual number of microplastics is about double the previous estimate, with the long-lasting particles now out-numbering organisms in the plankton. There are lots of plankton feeders in our seas (and organisms, like ourselves, who feed on the plankton feeders and their predators), so this insidious pollution is likely to have major effects on food chains.
This blog may help people explore some of the 'hidden' issues involved in certain media treatments of environmental and scientific issues. Using personal digital images, it's also intended to emphasise seasonal (and other) changes in natural history of the Swansea (South Wales) area. The material should help participants in field-based modules and people generally interested in the natural world. The views are wholly those of the author.
Friday, 22 May 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
It should hardly be called a study. A Which comparison looked at levels of nitrogen dioxide and small particulates (PM 2.5s) in 5 Londo...
-
Europe has a city congestion problem. In 2023, London was the most gridlocked location, closely followed by Paris and Dublin. In that year...
-
It's necessary, where possible, to replace diesel and petrol-fueled vehicles by electrical equivalents. Electric vehicles (EVs) don...
No comments:
Post a Comment